The donkey and the elephant—symbols so familiar they’ve become shorthand for American politics—have long represented the Democratic and Republican parties. But beneath these mascots lies a deeper story: one of ideological drift, systemic entrenchment, and a monetary system that both parties have failed to confront meaningfully. This article traces the evolution of these symbols and the parties they represent, ultimately arguing that neither is equipped—or perhaps even willing—to challenge the economic forces that undermine the republic.
π΄ The Donkey: From Insult to Identity
The Democratic donkey dates back to the 1828 presidential campaign of Andrew Jackson. Opponents mockingly called him a “jackass,” but Jackson embraced the image, using the donkey on his campaign posters to symbolize stubbornness and populist grit. Over time, the donkey became synonymous with the Democratic Party’s self-styled advocacy for the “common man.”
π The Elephant: A Cartoon’s Legacy
The Republican elephant emerged later, in 1874, through Thomas Nast’s political cartoon “The Third-Term Panic.” In it, an elephant labeled “Republican vote” is frightened toward chaos—specifically inflation and instability—by a lion-costumed donkey. Ironically, the cartoon’s themes of monetary fear and political dysfunction remain eerily relevant today.
π️ Factions Before Parties: The Founding Era
Before mascots, before platforms, there were factions. During George Washington’s presidency, political divisions were informal: the “Administration” faction (aligned with Alexander Hamilton and John Adams) favored a strong central government, while the “Opposition” (led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison) championed states’ rights.
By the fifth Congress (1797–1799), these factions had solidified into formal parties:
- Federalists: Advocated centralized power and commercial interests.
- Republicans (later Jeffersonian Republicans): Defended agrarianism and state sovereignty.
The term “Democrat” was initially a slur, evoking mob rule and the chaos of the French Revolution. Yet over time, the Jeffersonian Republicans embraced democratic ideals and rebranded themselves accordingly.
π Party Evolution: Names and Ideologies Shift
As the 19th century progressed, party names and alignments shifted dramatically:
- Adams Republicans became National Republicans.
- Jackson Republicans became Democratic Republicans, then simply Democrats.
- National Republicans evolved into the Whigs, opposing “King Andrew” Jackson’s populism.
- The Whigs dissolved over slavery, giving rise to the Republican Party by the 34th Congress.
These transformations weren’t just semantic—they reflected deep ideological battles over federal power, economic policy, and civil rights.
π° Platforms of Principle: 1856 vs. 2012
Compare the platforms of 1856 to those of 2012, and the contrast is stark.
π§Ύ 1856 Democratic Platform:
- Opposed a national bank, warning of “deadly hostility” to liberty.
- Advocated separation of government funds from private banking.
- Defended presidential veto power as a safeguard against financial tyranny.
π§Ύ 1856 Republican Platform:
- Condemned slavery and polygamy as “twin relics of barbarism.”
- Decried violations of constitutional rights in Kansas Territory.
- Called for accountability and justice in the face of government overreach.
These were platforms of conviction—rooted in principle, not marketing.
π’ 2012 Democratic Platform:
- Opens with a testimonial about auto industry recovery.
- Mentions Al-Qaeda and 9/11 in the second paragraph.
- Reads more like a corporate brochure than a political manifesto.
π 2012 Republican Platform:
- Emphasizes constitutional fidelity, but selectively.
- Reinterprets the First and Second Amendments without acknowledging foundational context.
- Lacks the moral urgency of its 19th-century predecessor.
π The Monetary System: A Shared Blind Spot
The 1856 Democrats warned that a centralized “money power” would become “dangerous to our republican institutions and the liberties of the people.” Today, that prophecy has come true.
- Federal and consumer debt rise regardless of party control.
- Waste and overproduction persist across administrations.
- Incarceration rates climb, untouched by partisan promises.
Both parties treat economic “growth” as a metric of elite prosperity, not sustainable development. Their platforms speak volumes but deliver little. They operate within an ideological box—Republicans shape it, Democrats fill it—and neither can escape it.
π ️ Rhetoric vs. Reality
Modern political platforms say ten times as much, mean half as much, and do even less. The disasters each party warns of move slowly, but they are real—and still rectifiable. What’s needed is not another mascot or slogan, but a reckoning with the monetary system itself.
Until then, the donkey and the elephant will continue their dance—each blaming the other, each failing to fix what matters most.
The "money powers" agent, inflation, " is a man-made scourge, made possible by the fact that most men do not understand it. It is a crime committed on so large a scale that its size is its protection: the integrating capacity of the victims’ minds breaks down before the magnitude—and the seeming complexity—of the crime, which permits it to be committed openly, in public. For centuries, inflation has been wrecking one country after another, yet men learn nothing, offer no resistance, and perish—not like animals driven to slaughter, but worse: like animals stampeding in search of a butcher." As put by Ayn Rand.I'll end with my favorite line from a movie called "Waking Life".
You can't fight city hall, death and taxes. Don't talk about politics or religion.This is all the equivalent of enemy propaganda rolling across the picket line " Lay down, G.I. Lay down, G.I." We saw it all through the 20th Century. And now in the 21st Century, it's time to stand up and realize...that we should not allow ourselves to be crammed into this rat maze. We should not submit to dehumanization. I don't know about you, but I'm concerned with what's happening in this world. I'm concerned with the structure. I'm concerned with the systems of control, those that control my life and those that seek to control it even more! I want freedom! That's what I want! And that's what you should want! It's up to each and every one of us to turn loose and just shovel the greed, the hatred, the envy and, yes, the insecurities...
because that is the central mode of control-- make us feel pathetic, small...so we'll willingly give up our sovereignty, our liberty, our destiny.
We have got to realize that we're being conditioned on a mass scale. Start challenging this corporate slave state! The 21st Century is gonna be a new century, not the century of slavery, not the century of lies and issues of no significance...and classism and statism and all the rest of the modes of control! It's gonna be the age of humankind... standing up for something pure and something right! What a bunch of garbage-- liberal Democrat, conservative Republican. It's all there to control you. Two sides of the same coin. Two management teams bidding for control!
The C.E.O. job of Slavery, Incorporated!
The truth is out there in front of you, but they lay out this buffet of lies! I'm sick of it, and I'm not gonna take a bite out of it! Do you got me?
Resistance is not futile. We're gonna win this thing. Humankind is too good! We're not a bunch of underachievers! We're gonna stand up and we're gonna be human beings! We're gonna get fired up about the real things, the things that matter: creativity and the dynamic human spirit that refuses to submit!" -driving megaphone guy
No comments:
Post a Comment